Daniil Glinka vs Charlie Camus Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the recent form of Camus and Glinka provides insights into predicting their upcoming tennis match. Over the past six months, Camus has won 42.24% of points on their second serve, whereas Glinka has a slightly better performance, winning 44.18% of such points. This statistic is crucial as it correlates highly with match prediction accuracy.

Delving into return game performance, Camus has excelled in winning 46.88% of their opponent’s second serve points, while Glinka trails slightly, winning 43.03%. When looking at first-serve return points, Camus leads with 26.95%, compared to Glinka’s 22.81%, indicating a potential edge for Camus in this aspect.

Their performance under pressure reveals Glinka has been more resilient, saving 54.5% of breakpoints compared to Camus, who has saved 41.67%. Moreover, in terms of breakpoint conversion, Camus has converted 31.11% of opportunities, while Glinka has capitalized on 32.22% of their chances, suggesting a slight advantage for Glinka in breakpoint situations.

In a broader performance overview over the past year, Glinka has a winning percentage of 62.69% (42 wins and 25 losses) in matches played, surpassing Camus, who has a win rate of 39.22% (20 wins and 31 losses). Therefore, Glinka's success in matches suggests a stronger overall form.

The preferred playing surface for these athletes could influence match outcomes. Camus performs best on clay with a 50% win rate (18 wins and 18 losses), while Glinka's best comes on indoor hard surfaces at 57% (62 wins and 47 losses). Nonetheless, Camus struggles more on indoor hard surfaces, winning only 20% of their matches (3 wins and 12 losses), whereas Glinka fares worse on clay, with a 47% win rate (26 wins and 29 losses).

In direct head-to-head encounters, Glinka has won their sole previous match against Camus, capturing both sets easily. This matchup, which took place at the M25+H Bagneres-de-Bigorre event, ended 6-1, 6-3 in Glinka's favor. No matches between them have yet required a deciding set.

The players have faced different levels of competition, with Camus's average opponent having a rank of 317.82 compared to 426.94 for Glinka. Despite this, Glinka’s 69.81% win rate in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K stands markedly higher than Camus’s 41.3%, reinforcing Glinka's edge in consistency and success at this competitive level.

Considering all the statistics analyzed, Glinka seems to have a comprehensive advantage, based on recent form, head-to-head statistics, and performance under pressure. Thus, the prediction tips toward Glinka as the potential winner of their upcoming match based on favorable historical and statistical comparisons.